This is part 1 of a multipart series of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this informative article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it does, some facts about the existing state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.
The legislators are trying to protect us from something, or are they? The whole lot seems a little confusing to say the least.
The House, and the Senate, are once again considering the problem of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have already been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.
The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte has the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all forms of online gambling, to create it illegal for a gambling business to just accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block use of gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.
In the same way does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, helps it be illegal for gambling businesses to just accept charge cards, electronic transfers, checks and other types of payment, but his bill doesn’t address the placement of bets.
The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is simply a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It is targeted on preventing gambling businesses from accepting charge cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and just like the Kyl bill makes no changes to what happens to be legal.
In accordance with Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling happens to be illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It is common for illegal gambling businesses to work freely until police finds and stops them.”
In fact, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Not many states have laws which make online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes took steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some forms of online gambling to be legal.메이저사이트
Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all forms of interstate gambling and take into account new technologies. Under current federal law, it is unclear whether utilising the Internet to work a gambling business is illegal” ;.
Goodlatte’s bill however doesn’t “cover all forms of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for many forms of online gambling such as state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act don’t make online gambling illegal, they make it illegal for a gambling business to just accept online bets where a person risks something of value “upon the results of a contest of others, a sporting event, or even a game predominantly subject to chance”, except of course when it is circumstances lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or among additional situations.
The reality of the problem is that many online gambling businesses have positioned in other countries specifically to avoid the gray area that is the existing state of online gambling in the US. As a result, there’s little that police can perform to enforce these laws. Trying to help make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, won’t make them easier to enforce.
As well, most, if not all, banks and bank card companies won’t transfer money to an on line gambling business now, consequently of pressure from the federal government. As a result, alternative payment systems sprang up to fill the void.
Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal usage of payment system instruments, charge cards, and wire transfers.” But once we already know, most charge cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.
Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is a growing reason for debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry.” If the bank card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S are not allowing the funding of gambling, how would it be “a growing reason for debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we want legislation to ensure that the financial industry to guard itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were an issue for them, wouldn’t they only stop accepting them?